Academic Cannibalism

Academic cannibalism

Annual Theme 2024

What could a university look like that does not consume itself, but is resolutely oriented towards a planetary future? How much Apollonian order would it need and how much Dionysian energy? How could the members of such a university dwell in it? And how radically democratic could it be?


The annual theme of the artsprogram and the Center for Cultural Production 2024 follows on from the predominantly pessimistic debates on the state of universities, in which they are described as "darkocracies" (Peter Fleming), psychic hells or as places of white oppression. As part of the lecture series, we want to investigate these self-descriptions and their effects, shed light on the mechanisms of (self-)sabotage of critical thinking, but also discuss alternative educational formats. The annual theme of artsprogram and the Center for Cultural Production 2024 follows on from the predominantly pessimistic debates on the state of universities, in which they are described as "darkocracies" (Peter Fleming), psychic hells or places of white oppression. As part of the lecture series, we want to investigate these self-descriptions and their effects, shed light on the mechanisms of (self-)sabotage of critical thinking, but also discuss alternative educational formats.


Beyond that stage designer Katharina Pia Schütz will transform the university's art space, the White Box, into a futuristic study room containing an artistic archive of utopian, failed, experimental and surprising educational formats and alternative educational institutions. The spectrum ranges from Black Mountain College to the "New Centre for Research & Practice and the Fixing the Future platform". Over the course of the year, the study space, bathed in a cool, magical blue, will be used to show, perform, document and experience how Academia can also be conceived.

Erster Inhalt

As early as the 1980s, the philosopher Jean-François Lyotard made the observation of an unstoppable "mercantilization of knowledge". "The old principle that the acquisition of knowledge is indissociable from the training (Bildung) of minds, or even of individuals, is becoming obsolete and will become ever more so," he summarized at the time. In the 21st century, professors and students are now primarily practicing a kind of over-regulated pseudo-entrepreneurship, preferably raising their own funding. At the same time, however, their members operate in a highly bureaucratized academic routine in which the constant expectation and demand for self-evaluation and external evaluation has become ubiquitous practice. Evaluation, which promises to advance the development of individual researchers and institutes, equips students with the power to evaluate without empowering them intellectually. As a result, writes historian Joan Wallach-Scott, students become customers and professors become bureaucratic service providers. To paraphrase Friedrich Kittler's famous formula of the “exorcism of spirit from the humanities” (Austreibung des Geistes aus den Geisteswissenschaften), this de facto promotes an expulsion of the critical spirit (Geist), and it does so far beyond the humanities.


Are universities therefore possibly places that raise false expectations and leave them to a toxic existence? Are they places that, as the Australian management professor Peter Fleming said, have become a psychological hell, "darkocracies"? If one reads the literature of recent decades, universities are in ruins (Bill Readings) or appear as places of white oppression into which critical minds should only sneak in order to steal as much as possible from them; at least this is what the American cultural theorists Stefano Harney and Fred Moten suggested.

Many self-descriptions of professional academics tend to lament the situation of universities from an (imagined) position of victimhood. In the context of the lecture series, however, we want to ask to what extent it is not external constraints or a cannibalistic capitalism that undermines its own foundations - as Nancy Fraser has recently described it - that is to blame for the current academic misery, but rather a central element of late capitalist ideology that has been part of the self-image of academics for much longer as a phantasm of sovereignty: the assumption of being creative, innovative, free and flexible.

In a lecture series, we want to discuss which ideas lead to a kind of self-sabotage of critical thinking and which alternatives can be developed.

Lecture Series

Relisten to the lectures on Apple Podcast here 

Exhibition

Blueprints for Studies | Katharina Pia Schütz | 15.03. - 10.12.2024 | WhiteBox ZF-Campus

More information

Other Events 

Friday 15.03.24 | Exhibition Operning „Blueprints for Studies“ – a Study Space from Katharina Pia Schütz Kunst-Freitag | Opening at 19.00h Introduction to the Archive 20.00h


Program & Archive

More information

Time to decide

This website uses external media, such as maps and videos, as well as external analytics tools – all of which may be used to collect data about your online behavior. Cookies are also stored when you visit our website. You can adjust or revoke your consent to the use of cookies and extensions at any time.

For an explanation of how our privacy settings work and an overview of the analytics/marketing tools and external media we use, please see our privacy policy.